🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, laying waste to the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach came at the executive and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Over System & Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power Behind Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to fire him for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later bin him for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.